<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Law Student Forum | law forum and law wiki - Contract Law</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A contract is an exchange of promises between two or more parties to do, or refrain from doing, an act, which resulting contract is enforceable in a court of law. It is a binding legal agreement. [1] That is to say, a contract is an exchange of promises for the breach of which the law will provide a remedy.]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:48:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>what kinds of remedies can equity provided and contract cant?</title>
			<link>http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/contract-law/18178-what-kinds-remedies-can-equity-provided-contract-cant.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:54:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[i have no idea of how to start of the question... 
"the interesting question... is whether equity can provide a remedy which cannot be provided by...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start -->i have no idea of how to start of the question...<br />
&quot;the interesting question... is whether equity can provide a remedy which cannot be provided by contract. It seems clear that the principles of the law of estoppel have not yet been fully developed...&quot;<br />
[per judge LJ, Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks &amp; spencer plc (2001)]<br />
<br />
what kinds of remedies can equity provided which cannot be provided by contract in cases where there is deficient consideration? To what extent can the principles of law of estoppel be developed?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/contract-law/">Contract Law</category>
			<dc:creator>Poh Mei Shan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/contract-law/18178-what-kinds-remedies-can-equity-provided-contract-cant.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>unilateral contracts</title>
			<link>http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/contract-law/17398-unilateral-contracts.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A unilateral offer is made in a newspaper, the offeror then wishes to revoke the offer and does this in a different newspaper to that which the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><!-- google_ad_section_start -->A unilateral offer is made in a newspaper, the offeror then wishes to revoke the offer and does this in a different newspaper to that which the original offer was.  Can he do this?  Would Shuey v US apply still?<br />
<br />
Thanks<!-- google_ad_section_end --></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/contract-law/">Contract Law</category>
			<dc:creator>m_sam</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lawstudentforum.co.uk/contract-law/17398-unilateral-contracts.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
